TP53, FLT3, KIT, NRAS and WT1 gene point mutations detection in acute myeloid leukemia with abnormal karyotype
Vinogradov А. V., Rezaykin A. V., Sergeev A. G.
Sverdlovsk Regional Ministry of Health, Ural State Medical University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federatian
Abstract. Aim: to estimate the frequency of mutations in FLT3 gene exons 12–15 and 19–21, KIT gene exons 7–12 and 16–19, NRAS gene exons 1–4, TP53 gene exons 4–11, WT1 gene exons 6-9 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (pts) with abnormal karyotype using direct sequencing technique.
Materials and methods. Bone marrow and peripheral blood samples were obtained from 55 AML pts aged 20 to 79, who were treated in Sverdlovsk Regional Hematological Centre during the period 2008 – 2014. Distribution of the pts according to FAB-classification was as follows: AML M0 – 3, M1 – 2, M2 – 29, M4 – 12, M4eo – 3, M5 – 1, M6 – 4, blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm — 1. Total RNA was extracted from leukemic cells and subjected to reverse transcription. FLT3 gene exons 12–15 and 19–21, KIT gene exons 7–12 and 16–19, NRAS gene exons 1–4, TP53 gene exons 4–11 and WT1 gene exons 6–9 were amplified by PCR. Detection of mutations in FLT3, KIT, NRAS, TP53 and WT1 genes was performed by direct sequencing. Sequencing was realized using an automatic genetic analyzer ABI Prism 310.
Results. The average frequency of functionally significant mutations in all investigated genes among the treated AML pts was 38.2 %, and varied in different morphologic, cytogenetic subgroups and in the presence of other genetic abnormalities. Average frequency in AML with abnormal karyotype of NRAS mutations was 19.2 %, TP53 – 18.4 %, KIT – 14.3 %, FLT3 – 9.6 %, WT1 – 3.6 %. There was no molecular damage in TP53 and WT1 tumor suppressor genes in acute myeloid leukemia with abnormal karyotype were accompanied by or mutations of genes, encoding cell signaling proteins (FLT3, KIT and NRAS). In 23.8 % cases AML pts with abnormal karyotype and co-existing mutations in proto-oncogenes and anti-oncogenes characterized by more dismal prognosis and poor response to standard chemotherapeutic regimens.
Key words: point mutation, acute myeloid leukemia, TP53 gene, FLT3 gene, KIT gene, NRAS gene, WT1 gene, sequencing
REFERENCES
1. Sergeev A.G., Ivanov R.A. Genetic diagnostics of leukemias. – Ekaterinburg: USMA, 1998. – 39 p.
2. Sergeev A.G., Ivanov R.A., Fechina L.G. Diagnostic and prognostic impact of genetic abnormalities in the acute leukemia. Hematology and transfusiology. – 2000. – V.45. – N.1. pp. 28-35.
3. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. NEJM. – 2013. – V.368. – N. 22. pp. 2059-2074.
4. Lindsley R.C., Mar B.G., Mazzola E. Acute myeloid leukemia ontogeny is defined by distinct somatic mutations. Blood. – 2014. pii: blood-2014-11-610543. [Epub ahead of print].
5. Walter M.J., Shen D., Ding L. et al. Clonal architecture of secondary acute myeloid leukemia. NEJM. – 2012. – V. 366. pp. 1090-1098.
6. Vinogradov A. V. Clinical and diagnostic impact of genetic abnormalities in the acute myeloid leukemia program treatment. MD dissertation. – Ekaterinburg, 2009. – 114 p.
7. Döhner H., Estey E.H., Amadori S. et al. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. – 2010. – V.115. – N.3. pp. 453-474.
8. Swerdlow S. H., Campo E., Harris N. L. et al. WHO classification of tumors of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon: IARC, 2008. – 439 p.
9. Gröschel S., Sanders M.A., Hoogenboezem R. et al. Mutational spectrum of myeloid malignancies with inv(3)/t(3;3) reveals a predominant involvement of RAS/RTK signaling pathways. Blood. – 2015. – V.125. – N.1. pp. 133-139.
10. Haferlach C. Genes break barrier between MDS and AML. Blood. – 2015. – V.125. – N.1. pp. 9-10.
11. Vinogradov A.V., Rezaikin A.V., Sergeev A.G. TP53, FLT3, KIT, N-RAS, NPM1 and WT1 gene mutations complex investigation in acute myeloid leukemia using direct sequencing method. Biomics. – 2012. – V.3. – N. 1. pp. 22-243.
12. Ishikawa Y., Kiyoi H., Tsujimura A. et al. Comprehensive analysis of cooperative gene mutations between class I and class II in de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Eur. Journal of Haematology. – 2009. – V.83. pp. 90-98.
13. Vardiman J.V., Thiele J., Arber D.A. et al. The 2008 revision of the WHO classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. – 2009. – V.114. – N.5. pp. 937-952.
14. Levis M. FLT3 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: what is the best approach in 2013? Hematology. – 2013. pp. 220-226.
15. Murati A., Brecqueville M., Devillier R. et al. Myeloid malignancies: mutations, models and management. BMC Cancer. – 2012. – V.12. – P. 304.
16. Rücker F. G., Schlenk R. F., Bullinger L. et al. TP53 alterations in acute myeloid leukemia with complex karyotype correlate with specific copy number alterations, monosomal karyotype, and dismal outcome. Blood. – 2012. – V.119. – pp. 2114-2121.
17. Afanasyev B.V., Zubarivskaya L.S. Role of hemopoietic stem cell transplantation in therapy of adult patients with acute leukemias. Oncohematology. – 2006. – N. 1-2. pp. 70-85.
18. Grossmann V., Schnittger S., Kohlmann A. et al. A novel hierarchical prognostic model of AML solely based on molecular mutations. Blood. – 2012. – V.120. pp. 2963-2972.
19. Paschka P., Döhner K. Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: can we improve HiDAC consolidation? Hematology. – 2013. pp. 209-219.
20. Schiller G.J. High-risk acute myeloid leukemia: treatment today … and tomorrow. Hematology. – 2013. pp. 201-208.
21. Walter R.B., Othus M., Burnett A.K. et al. Significance of FAB subclassification of «acute myeloid leukemia, NOS» in the 2008 WHO classification: analysis of 5848 newly diagnosed patients. Blood. – 2013. – V.121. – N.13. pp. 2424-2431.
22. Han E., Lee H., Kim M. et al. Characteristics of hematologic malignancies with coexisting t(9;22) and inv(16) chromosomal abnormalities. Blood Res. – 2014. – V.49. – N.1. pp.22-28.
23. Nacheva E.P., Grace C.D., Brazma D. et al. Does BCR/ABL1 positive acute myeloid leukaemia exist? // Br. J. Haematol. – 2013. – V.161. – N.4. pp.541-550.
24. Vinogradov A. V. Technology development of CDKN2A/ARF gene mutations detection, FLT3, KIT, NPM1, NRAS, TET2, TP53, WT1 during acute myeloid leukemia. Russian Journal of Oncology– 2013. – N. 4. pp. 34-35.
25. Vinogradov A.V., Rezaikin A.V., Sergeev A.G. Detection of flt3 gene internal tandem duplications and tyrosine kinase domain mutations in acute myeloid leukemia using automated sequencing technique. Vestnik ural'skoi meditsinskoi akademicheskoi nauki. – 2013. – N. 1. – pp. 64-66.
26. Vinogradov A.V., Rezaikin A.V., Sergeev A.G. Prognostic impact of tp53 mutations in the treatment of acute leukemia. Journal of N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center RAMS. – 2013. – V. 24. – N. 2. pp. 33-40.
27. Vinogradov A. V., Rezaikin A. V., Sergeev A. G. TP53 gene point mutation detection using sequencing techniques in acute and chronic leukemia patients. Cellular Therapy and Transplantation. — 2010. ¬– V. 3. – N.9. pp. 126.
28. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N. et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods // Mol. Biol. Evol. – 2011. – V. 28. – N. 10. pp. 2731-2739.
29. Program treatment of hematologic diseases. Proceedings of diagnostic algorithms and treatment protocols of hematologic diseases. Ed. V. G. Savchenko. – M.: Praktika, 2012. — 1056 p.
30. Savchenko V.G., Parovichnikova E.N., Afanasyev B.V. et al. National clinical guidelines for adult acute myeloid leukemia diagnostics and treatment. Hematology and transfusiology. – 2014. – V.59. – S.2. pp. 2-29.
31. Schlenk R. F., Döhner H. Genomic applications in the clinic: use in treatment paradigm of acute myeloid leukemia. Hematology. – 2013. pp. 324-330.
32. Vinogradov A. V. The certificate of state registration for the computer program «Gene analysis» N. 2014610088, 09.01.2014, issued by Russian federal bureau for intellectual property, patents and trademarks.
33. Vinogradov A.V., Rezaikin A.V., Sergeev A.G. et al. A comparative analysis of TP53 gene mutations in acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Cellular Therapy and Transplantation. – 2011. – V.3. – N.12. – P. 114.
34. Testa U., Riccioni R. Deregulation of apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia. Hematologica. – 2007. – V. 92. – N.1. pp. 81-94.
35. Goyama S., Mulloy J.C. Molecular pathogenesis of core binding factor leukemia: current knowledge and future prospects. Int. J. Hematol. – 2011. – V.94. – N.2. pp.126-133.
36. Renneville A., Roumier C., Biggio V. et al. Cooperating gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: a review of the literature. Leukemia. – 2008. – V.22. pp. 915-931.
37. Takahashi S. Current findings for recurring mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Journal of Hematology & Oncology. – 2011. – V.4. – P. 36.
Authors
Vinogradov Alexander V.
Sverdlovsk Regional Ministry of Health, Department of Specialized and Hi-Tech Medical Care
MD, chief therapist, scientific advisor
Russian Federation, 620014, Ekaterinburg, Wainer str., 34b
vinogradov-av@russia.ru
Rezaykin Alexey V.
Ural State Medical University, Department of microbiology, virology and immunology, Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostic
MD, assistant
Russian Federation, 620028, Ekaterinburg, Repin str., 3
alexrez@usma.ru
Sergeev Alexander G.
Ural State Medical University, Department of microbiology, virology and immunology, Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostic
MD, professor, chief of the department, scientific chief of the laboratory
Russian Federation, 620028, Ekaterinburg, Repin str., 3
sergeev@usma.ru