The Weakness of Labor — Historical Aspects and Current Perfomance
DOI: 10.22138/2500-0918-2017-14-4-458-469
N.M. Milyaeva
Ural State Medical University, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Abstract. Among all the anomalies of labor activity the bottom of the first place is the primary weakness of labor, in 70-80% of cases develop in somatically healthy young nulliparous women. Known classification not imagine the possibility of creating absolute statistical vector of this disease timely delivery. With timely delivery, complicated by the primary weakness of labor activity remains high maternal and perinatal morbidity and death of fetuses and newborns, the growth of abdominal and vaginal operative delivery and maternal and neonatal injuries.The purpose of the study: consider the features of definitions, classifications, clinical indicators and perinatal aspects of primary weakness of labor in a dynamic historical perspective.The results of the work: presented and analyzed dynamic historical views about the classification and clinical parameters of primary weakness of labor activity, as well as features perinatal outcomes in complicated childbirth hypotonic form of the uterine contractile activity.Conclusions: the identified need to continue basic scientific research for the systematization and research of the pathogenesis of primary weakness of labor for improving birth outcomes.
Keywords: weakness of labor activity, prognosis, obstetrics, prenatal outcomes
Received 16.10.2017
For citation:
Milyaeva N.M. The weakness of labor – historical aspects and current performance. Vestn. Ural. Med. Akad. Nauki. Journal of Ural Medical Academic Science. 2017, Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 458–469. DOI: 10.22138/2500-0918-2017-14-4-458-469 (In Russ)
REFERENCES
1. Abramchenko V.V. labors and regulation. St. Petersburg: ELBI-SPb; 2006. (in Russ)
2. Abramchenko V.V., Shabalov N. P. Clinical maternal-fetal medicine. Petrozavodsk: Inteltek; 2004. (in Russ)
3. Abramchenko V.V., Kaplenko, O.V. Adrenergic tool in obstetric practice. St. Petersburg: ELBI-SPb; 2000. (in Russ)
4. Chernukha E.A. Generic unit. M.: Triada-X; 1999. (in Russ)
5. Sidorova I. S. Physiology and pathology of labor activity: textbook. M.: Medpress; 2006. (in Russ)
6. Bayev O.R., Komissarova L.M., beam, etc. because the Underlying Protocol of labour management. M.; 2014. (in Russ)
7. Krickaâ I.A. peculiarities of the early neonatal period in neonates from mothers with the weakness of labor: author. dis. kand. med. Sciences. Moscow; 2005. (in Russ)
8. Aylamazyan E.K. Obstetrics: Textbook for medical schools. St. Petersburg: Special literature; 1997. (in Russ)
9. Aylamazyan E.K. Emergency care in extreme conditions in obstetric practice. SPb: N. L.; 2002. (in Russ)
10. Savitsky A.G., Savitsky A. G. Biomechanics physiological and pathological labor pain. St. Petersburg: ELBI-SPb; 2003. (in Russ)
11. Abramchenko V.V. Active management of labor: a Guide for physicians. St. Petersburg: Special literature; 1999. (in Russ)
12. Podtetenev A.D., Strizhova N. In. Anomalies of labor activity: textbook. M.: MIA, 2006. (in Russ)
13. Kuzmina O.V. the Problem of regulation of labor in modern obstetrics. International medical journal. 2005; 4: 61-4. (in Russ)
14. Hill A. Mechanics of muscle contraction. Moscow: Mir; 1972. (in Russ)
15. Serov V.N., Strizhakov A.N., Markin, S.A. Manual of practical obstetrics. Medical national Agency; 1999. ((in Russ)
16. Kulakov V.I., Sidorova I.S., Makarov I.O. Manual on obstetrics. M.: Meditsina; 2006. (in Russ)17. Bumm, E. guide to the study of obstetrics. SPb: Practical medicine; 1906. (in Russ)
18. Zefirova T.P., Zhelezova M. E., Yagovkina N. E. Anomalies of labor: mechanisms of formation and risk factors. The practice of medicine. 2010; 4: 10-4. (in Russ)
19. Podtetenev A. D., Bratchikova T. V., Kotis G. A. Regulation of labor. M.: peoples ' friendship University; 2004. (in Russ)
20. Persianinov L.S., Dill E.A., Starostina G.A. anomalies of labor. M.: Medgiz; 1977. (in Russ)
21. Mohsin S.V. the Role of adrenoreactivity in development of anomalies of labor activity. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2007; 6: 6-8. (in Russ)
22.Emanuel A. Friedman Labor: Clinical evaluation and management. Second edition. Appletion-Century-Crofts. New York; 1978.
23. Duda V.I., Duda V.L. And. Duda I.V. Pathological obstetrics. Minsk: Higher school, 2001. (in Russ)
24. Yakovlev I. I. Anomalies of patrimonial power in the modern clinical and physiological presentation. In the book. Clinical and physiological monitoring of the function of the urinary and reproductive systems in pregnant and non-pregnant women. L.; 1957: 7-38. (in Russ)
25. Yakovlev I. I. About the nature of anomalies tribal forces and recommended obstetric events. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1961; 5: 13-4. (in Russ)
26. Persianinov L.S., Zheleznov B.I., Epiphany N. Physiology and pathology of the uterine contractile activity. M.: Medicine; 1975. (in Russ)
27. Petchenko, A.I. Clinic picture and treatment of uterine inertia. Leningrad: Medgiz; 1956. (in Russ)
28. Voskresensky S.L. Biomechanism of childbirth: discrete-wave theory. Minsk: Polybag; 1996. (in Russ)
29. Yung, H. Patalogue der Wehentätigkeit. Uterine distocue. Ginäkologe (Berl.). 1974; 7 (2): 68-73.
30. Caldeyro-Barcia R., Alvarez H. Abnormal uterine active in labor. J.Obstet. Gynecol. Brit. Emp. 1952; 59 (5): 646-56.
31. Radzinsky V. E. Obstetric aggression. M.: Status Rheae; 2011. (in Russ)
32. Bayev O.R., Rubtsov S.V., Vasil'chenko, O.N., Rumyantseva V.P., Aleksandrova N. In. The duration of «normal» childbirth in modern conditions. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012; 1: 49-54. (in Russ)
33. Bayev O.R., Belousov V.S. anomalies of labor in nulliparous older than 30 years. Questions of gynecology, obstetrics and Perinatology. 2005; 1: 5-10. (in Russ)
34. Abramchenko V. V., Bibilashvili Z. V., Rudakov S. T., Semenov O. P. Modern aspects of the regulation of labor activity. M.: MIA; 1997. (in Russ)
35. Omelyanyuk E.V. Clinical and physiological characteristics of uterine activity in preliminary period, and modern clinical management of pregnancy with him: author.dis. kand.med.Sciences. L. 1974. 34 S. (in Russ)
36. Reynolds S. Physiology of the uterus: with clinical correlations. 2 end. Ed. New Jork: Harbes; 1949.
37. Carlson Nicole Smith (Ph.D., Nursing) Comparative Effectiveness of Labor Management in Obese, Nulliparous Women. Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado; 2015.
38. Sandström A., Cnattingius S., Wikström A.K. et al. Labour dystocia-risk of recurrence and instrumental delivery in following labour — a population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2012; 119 (13): 1648-56.
39. Khasanov A.A., Bakirova I.A. Promising directions in the study of the mechanisms of development of anomalies of uterine activity (a literature review) Almanac of modern science and education. 2010; 3: 398-403. (in Russ)
40. Crane J.M., Young D.C., Butt BCD. et. al. Excessive uterine activity accompanyng inducet labor. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001; 97 (6): 926-31.
41. Tsirkin V. I., Medvedev B. I., Plekhanov L. M. et al. Role of β-adrenergic mechanism in regulating the contractile activity of the uterus of women. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1986; 1: 19- 22. (in Russ)
42. Echeverrha E., Rocha M. Randomized comparative study of induced labor with oxytocin and misoprostol in prolonged pregnancies. Rev. Chil. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002; 60 (2): 108–11.
43. Stabbs T.M. Oxytocin for labor induction II Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 43 (3): 489-94.
44. Lieberman E., O'Donoghue C. Unintended effect of epidural analgesia during labor: a systematic rewiew. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002; 186 (5): 31-68.
45. Karaganova E., Karabanovich Y. Risk factors for perinatal morbidity after the labor complicated with premature rupture of membranes at term. XI World Congress of Perinatal Medicine. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2013; 41: 756.
46. Savelyeva G.M., Karaganov E.J., Karabanovich Y.V., Grabovsky V.M., Tretyakov, M.V., Premature rupture of membranes at term. The principles of delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2009; 4, pp. 6-11. (in Russ)
47. Karaganov E.J., Karabanovich Y.V. Comparative assessment of different methods of management of labor in premature rupture of membranes. Issues of obstetrics, gynecology and Perinatology. 2015; 14 (1): 24-30. (in Russ)
48. Handel M. G. peculiarities of contractile activity of the uterus during premature rupture of membranes in nulliparous. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1984; 7: 28-30. (in Russ)
49. Bayev O.R., Rumyantseva V.P., Burduli G.M., Palenikova O.L. Prognostic factors of effectiveness of mifepristone in preparation for childbirth. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2011; 8: 91-95. (in Russ)
50. Bayev O.R., Rumyantsev V.P. Mifepristone For Labor Preinduction And Induction. Farmateka = Pharmateca. 2011. No. 13, pp. 75-79. (in Russ)
51. Impey L., Greenwood C, Mac Quillan K. et al. Fever in labour and neonatal encephalopathy:a prospective cohort study. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001; 108 (6), pp. 594-597.
Author
Natalia M.Milyaeva
Ural State Medical University
Cand.Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Russian Federation, 620028, Yekaterinburg, str. Repin, 3
soneta64@rambler.ru