Modern Approaches to Predicting Primary Weakness of Labour at Primiparous Women

DOI: 10.22138/2500-0918-2017-14-2-147-155

N. M. Milyaeva

 

Ural State Medical University, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation

Abstract. Among all anomalies of labor, the bottom of the first places is the primary weakness of labor, in 70–80 % of cases develop in young primiparas of somatically healthy women. At the same time, maternal and perinatal morbidity, death of fetuses and newborns, the growth of operative abdominal and vaginal births and birth trauma continue to be high. The purpose of the study: optimization of prenatal prognosis of primary weakness of labor activity to improve the outcome of labor. Materials and methods: A real prospective, continuous, comparative cohort randomized trial to identify risk factors and prognosis of obstetrical pathology is performed during gestation at 39.9–40.6 weeks gestation in 287 primiparous women. On the fact of clinical course of childbirth, two groups were formed: I primary group (n = 119) — timely delivery with primary SRS; II comparison group (n = 168) — timely labor with coordinated labor activity (KRD). All women in the prenatal period under the term of full-term pregnancy underwent clinical and laboratory-instrumental research in accordance with the available standards of management of pregnant women, as well as the study of enzymes of cellular energy exchange and molecular-genetic study of polymorphism of energy metabolism genes. The results of the work: a model for predicting the primary weakness of labor was proposed based on a complex of clinical, biophysical, biochemical, molecular genetic, functional research methods to improve the outcome of timely delivery in young primiparous women.

Keywords: weakness of labor activity, prognosis, obstetrics

Received 30.05.2017

For citation:
Milyaeva N.M. Modern approaches to predicting primary weakness of labour at primiparous women. Vestn. Ural. Med. Akad. Nauki = Jour. Ural Med. Acad. Science. 2017, no. 2, pp. 147–155. DOI: 10.22138/2500-0918-2017-14-2-147-155 (In Russ.)

REFERENCES
1. Chernukha E.A. Family block. M.: Triad-X; 1999 (in Russ).
2. Sidorova IS Physiology and pathology of labor. М .: the MEDpress; 2006 (in Russ).
3. Baev OR, Komissarova LM, Puchko TK, Vasilchenko ON, Malbakhova ET, Polyanchikova OL, Shifman EM Basic protocol of labor management. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2011; Ad. 4: 3-10 (in Russ).
4. Kritskaya I.A. Features of the course of the early neonatal period in newborns from mothers with weakness of labor: author's abstract. Dis. … cand. honey. Sciences. Moscow, 2005 (in Russ).
5. Serov VN, Goroshilina GS, Kozhin AA Early diagnosis and prognosis of primary weakness of labor in women from groups of obstetric risk. Journal of the Russian Association of Obstetricians-Gynecologists. 2006; 1: 17-8 (in Russ).
6. Khasanov AA, Bakirova I.A. Prospective directions in studying the mechanisms of the development of abnormalities of contractile activity of the uterus (literature review). Almanac of modern science and education. 2010. No. 3: pp. 98-103 (in Russ).
7. Ivanov Yu.I., Pogorelyuk ON Statistical processing of the results of biomedical research. M .: Medicine; 1990 (in Russ).
8. Solovieva AS, Suprun SV, Yagupova AV, Efimenko MV Some indicators of the morphofunctional activity of peripheral blood lymphocytes in women with complicated course of pregnancy. Bulletin of Physiology and Pathology of Respiration. 2016; 61: 84-9 (in Russ).
9. Klembovsky, I.I., Sukhorukov V.S. The problem of energy dysfunction of cells in human pathology (pathogenesis and correction). Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences. 2007; 4: 62 -9 (in Russ).
10. Abramchenko V.V. The concept of energy deficiency and the dysfunction of mitochondria. Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases. 2001. No. 4. pp. 46-52 (in Russ).
11. Holt I.J., Harding A.E., Morgan-Hughes J.A. Deletions of muscle mitochondrial DNA in patients with mitochondrial myopathies. Nature 1988; 331: 717-19.
12. Kan NE, Donnikov AE, Tyutyunnik VL, Kesova MI, Demura TA Molecular-genetic predictors of the weakness of labor. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014. No. 4. pp. 27-32 (in Russ).
13. Baranov VS, ed. The genetic passport is the basis of individual and predictive medicine. St. Petersburg: N-L; 2009 (in Russ).
14. Algovik M., Nilson E., Cnattingius S., Lichtenstein P. Genetic influence on dystocia. Acta. Obstet. Ginecol. Scand. 2004. No. 83 (9). pp. 832-837.
15. Grishaeva L.A., Chekhonatskaya M.L., Rogozhina I.E., Yannaeva N.E. Ultrasonic evaluation of the cervix before delivery. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2010. No. 6 (2). pp. 288-92 (in Russ).

Author
Natalia M. Milyaeva
Ural State Medical University
Сand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Str. Repin, 3, Yekaterinburg, 620028, Russian Federation
soneta64@rambler.ru

Лицензия Creative Commons

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

 
 
 

Authorization